4.7 Article

A ZNRF3-dependent Wnt/β-catenin signaling gradient is required for adrenal homeostasis

Journal

GENES & DEVELOPMENT
Volume 33, Issue 3-4, Pages 209-220

Publisher

COLD SPRING HARBOR LAB PRESS, PUBLICATIONS DEPT
DOI: 10.1101/gad.317412.118

Keywords

Wnt signaling; adrenal zonation; mouse models; organ maintenance; proliferation

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [RO1-CA134606, RO1-DK043140]
  2. Worldwide Cancer Research [16-1052]
  3. Heather Rose Kornick Research Fund
  4. NIH Postdoctoral Training Grant [T32-DK071212]
  5. American Cancer Society-Michigan Cancer Research Fund Postdoctoral Fellowship [PF-17-227-01-DDC]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Spatiotemporal control of Wnt signaling is essential for the development and homeostasis of many tissues. The transmembrane E3 ubiquitin ligases ZNRF3(zinc and ring finger 3) and RNF43(ring finger protein 43) antagonize Wnt signaling by promoting degradation of frizzled receptors. ZNRF3 and RNF43 are frequently inactivated in human cancer, but the molecular and therapeutic implications remain unclear. Here, we demonstrate that adrenocortical-specific loss of ZNRF3, but not RNF43, results in adrenal hyperplasia that depends on Porcupine-mediated Wnt ligand secretion. Furthermore, we discovered a Wnt/beta-catenin signaling gradient in the adrenal cortex that is disrupted upon loss of ZNRF3. Unlike beta-catenin gain-of-function models, which induce high Wnt/beta-catenin activation and expansion of the peripheral cortex, ZNRF3 loss triggers activation of moderate-level Wnt/beta-catenin signaling that drives proliferative expansion of only the histologically and functionally distinct inner cortex. Genetically reducing beta-catenin dosage significantly reverses the ZNRF3-deficient phenotype. Thus, homeostatic maintenance of the adrenal cortex is dependent on varying levels of Wnt/beta-catenin activation, which is regulated by ZNRF3.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available