4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Advantages of Al based GEM detector aimed at plasma soft - semi hard X-ray radiation imaging

Journal

FUSION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN
Volume 146, Issue -, Pages 1039-1042

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2019.01.153

Keywords

Nuclear instruments for hot plasma diagnostics; X-ray detectors; SXR imaging; Electron multipliers (gas); Micropattern gaseous detectors; Aluminum GEM foils

Funding

  1. Euratom research and training programme [633053]
  2. Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Development of gaseous detectors, more specifically Gas Electron Multiplier (GEM) based detectors, for application at tokamak plasma radiation monitoring/ imaging in Soft-Semi Hard X-ray (S-SH) region is an ongoing research activity aiming to deliver valuable information on plasma shape, magnetic configuration, non-axisymmetry phenomena of the plasma, etc. Wide radiation range and brightness of plasma radiation impose some restrictions on choice of materials in the detecting chamber, as their interaction with the incident radiation may disrupt original signals. This work proposes usage of aluminum as GEM foils electrodes for the first time. The detector based on these foils was constructed and examined. The operational characteristics and spectral capabilities of such detector were compared with the ones based on the standard (commonly used) copper GEM foils. The laboratory tests were performed using X-ray tube and Fe-55 sources to examine detectors' capabilities in energy-resolved imaging. Additionally, simulations of origin and number of the generated electrons, which determine the detector signal, were performed for Al and Cu GEM foils for a wide energy range of incident photons. The experimental and modelling data demonstrated that Cu based GEM detector produces higher parasitic signal than Al one necessitating total elimination of copper from detector's chamber.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available