4.7 Article

Assessment of mycotoxin exposure and risk characterization using occurrence data in foods and urinary biomarkers in Brazil

Journal

FOOD AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY
Volume 128, Issue -, Pages 21-34

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2019.03.046

Keywords

Mycotoxins; Biomarkers; Urine; Food; Risk assessment; LC-MS/MS

Funding

  1. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq) [400649/2014-4]
  2. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior - Brasil (CAPES) [001]
  3. National Institutes of Health
  4. CESAM [UID/AMB/50017/2013]
  5. FEDER, within the PT2020 Partnership [POCI-01-0145-FEDER-00763]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to assess the exposure of Brazilian residents (N = 86) from rural areas to multiple mycotoxins and characterize the associated risk in two sampling periods (SP) (April-May and December/2016). Mycotoxins in food and urine samples were determined by liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry. Mean probable daily intake (PDI) values based on occurrence data in foods in both SP varied from 0.007 to 0.013, 0.069 to 1.002, 0.119 to 0.321 and 0.013-0.156 mu g kg(-1) body weight (bw) day(-1) for aflatoxins (AFs), deoxynivalenol (DON), fumonisins (FBs) and zearalenone (ZEN), respectively. Mean PDI values based on urinary biomarkers were 0.001, 84.914, 0.031, 0.377 and 0.002 mu g kg(-1) bw day(-1) for AFB(1), DON, ochratoxin A (OTA), FB1 and ZEN, respectively. Hazard quotient (HQ) calculated using food data revealed a potential health concern for ZEN in 2nd SP. HQ > 1 based on urinary biomarkers were observed for DON in the two SP. Although OTA was not detected in any food sample, the HQ based on urinary OTA levels was > 1 in the 1st SP. Margin of exposure values for AF from food and urine data in the 1st SP were below 10,000, indicating potential health risks.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available