4.2 Editorial Material

Efficacy and safety of abaloparatide for the treatment of post-menopausal osteoporosis

Journal

EXPERT OPINION ON PHARMACOTHERAPY
Volume 20, Issue 7, Pages 805-811

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2019.1583208

Keywords

Abaloparatide; postmenopausal osteoporosis; teriparatide; bone formation; osteoporosis treatment

Funding

  1. Grant GLPBone Istituto Auxologico Italiano IRCCS [2019_01_29_07]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: Osteoporosis is a skeletal disorder characterized by loss of bone mass and strength affecting up to 30-50% of postmenopausal women worldwide. Current therapeutic options include antiresorptives such as aminobisphosphonates or denosumab and osteoanabolic compounds such as teriparatide. Areas covered: In this review, the authors summarize the clinical development, safety and efficacy profile of abaloparatide, a new osteoanabolic agent recently marketed in the US for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis in women who are at high risk for fracture or who fail antiresorptive therapy. Expert opinion: Abaloparatide is a 1-34 PTH related peptide-like molecule that has been modified in order to potentiate the osteoanabolic effect. In its pivotal phase 3 trial in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, subcutaneous abaloparatide 80 mcg/day reduced the risk of vertebral, nonvertebral, major osteoporotic, and clinical fractures compared with placebo and reduced the risk of major osteoporotic fractures compared with teriparatide. These results, together with a reduced prevalence of hypercalcemia and a lower cost of the marketed compound, point toward improved cost effectiveness with abaloparatide versus teriparatide. However, some concerns have been raised due to a somewhat higher occurrence of adverse effects (particularly with palpitations and increased heart rate) or the resultant discontinuation due to these adverse effects when compared to teriparatide.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available