4.7 Article

Cam-type femoroacetabular impingement - correlations between alpha angle versus volumetric measurements and surgical findings

Journal

EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY
Volume 29, Issue 7, Pages 3431-3440

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-018-5968-z

Keywords

Hip joint; Femoroacetabular impingement; Image processing; Computer-assisted; Tomography

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aim Determine correlations of 3DCT cam-type femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) measurements with surgical findings of labral tear and cartilage loss. Methods Digital search of symptomatic cam-type FAI from July 2013 to August 2016 yielded 43 patients. Two readers calculated volumes of femoral head, bump, and alpha angles on 3DCT images. Correlations between CT and surgical findings, inter-, and intra-reader reliabilities were assessed using Spearman rank correlation and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Results Thirteen men and 14 women aged 3710 (mean SD) years were included. Most common clinical finding was positive flexion-adduction-internal rotation (70.4%). Twenty-seven labral tears and 20 cartilage defects were surgically detected. Significant correlations existed between femoral bump, head volumes, and extent of the labral tear (p=0.008 and 0.003). No significant correlations were found between the alpha angles at 12 to 3 o'clock and the extent of labral tear (p=0.2, 0.8, 0.9, and 0.09) or any measurement with the cartilage loss (p values for alpha 12 to 3, bump, and head volumes=0.7, 0.3, 0.9, 0.9, 0.07, and 0.2). Inter- and intra-reader reliabilities were excellent to moderate for femoral head and bump volumes (ICC=0.85, 0.52, and 0.8, 0.5) and moderate to poor for alpha angles (ICC=0.48, 0.40, 0.05, 0.25 and 0.3, 0.24, 0.29, 0.49). Conclusion Three dimensional volumetric measurements of cam-type FAI significantly correlate with the extent of intraoperative labral tears. Superior inter- and intra-reader reliability to that of alpha angles renders it a more clinically relevant measurement for quantifying cam morphology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available