4.6 Review

Adjunctive Nutraceuticals for Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY
Volume 173, Issue 6, Pages 575-587

Publisher

AMER PSYCHIATRIC PUBLISHING, INC
DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2016.15091228

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. C.R. Roper Fellowship at the University of Melbourne
  2. NHMRC Senior Principal Research Fellowship [1059660]
  3. Integria Healthcare
  4. MediHerb
  5. Pfizer
  6. Taki Mai
  7. Pepsico
  8. BioCeuticals
  9. Blackmores
  10. Soho-Flordis
  11. Elsevier
  12. HealthEd
  13. National Health and Medical Research Council
  14. FisherWallace
  15. Nordic Naturals
  16. Methylation Sciences
  17. PharmoRx Therapeutics
  18. AstraZeneca
  19. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  20. Forest
  21. National Institute of Mental Health
  22. Neuralstem
  23. PAMLAB
  24. Ridge Diagnostics
  25. Sunovion
  26. Tal Medical
  27. Theracos
  28. Acadia
  29. Alkermes
  30. Avanir
  31. AXSOME Therapeutics
  32. Biogen
  33. Cerecor
  34. Dinippon Sumitomo
  35. Eli Lilly
  36. EnVivo
  37. Euthymics Bioscience
  38. FORUM
  39. GenOmind
  40. GlaxoSmithKline
  41. Intracellular
  42. Janssen RD
  43. Johnson&Johnson Pharmaceutical Research and Development Lundbeck
  44. Merck
  45. MSI Methylation Sciences
  46. National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine
  47. National Coordinating Center for Integrative Medicine
  48. NIDA
  49. NIMH
  50. Naurex
  51. Nestle Health Sciences
  52. Novartis
  53. Nutrition 21
  54. Osmotica
  55. Otsuka
  56. Photothera
  57. PPD
  58. Puretech Ventures
  59. PsychoGenics
  60. RCT Logic
  61. Reckitt Benckiser
  62. Roche
  63. Sanofi-Aventis
  64. Servier Laboratories
  65. Stanley Medical Research Institute
  66. Taisho
  67. Takeda
  68. VistaGen
  69. Stanley Medical Research Foundation
  70. MBF
  71. NHMRC
  72. Cooperative Research Centre
  73. Simons Autism Foundation
  74. Cancer Council of Victoria
  75. Rotary Health
  76. Meat and Livestock Board
  77. Woolworths
  78. BeyondBlue
  79. Geelong Medical Research Foundation
  80. Organon
  81. Mayne Pharma
  82. Servier
  83. Wyeth
  84. Lundbeck

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: There is burgeoning interest in augmentation strategies for improving inadequate response to antidepressants. The adjunctive use of standardized pharmaceutical grade nutrients, known as nutraceuticals, has the potential to modulate several neurochemical pathways implicated in depression. While many studies have been conducted in this area, to date no specialized systematic review (or meta analysis) has been conducted. Method: A systematic search of PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science was conducted up to December 2015 for clinical trials using adjunctive nutrients for depression. Where sufficient data were available, a random-effects model analyzed the standard mean difference between treatment and placebo in the change from baseline to endpoint, combining the effect size data. Funnel plot and heterogeneity analyses were also performed. Results: Primarily positive results were found for replicated studies testing S-adenosylmethionine (SAMe), methylfolate, omega-3 (primarily EPA or ethyl-EPA), and vitamin D, with positive isolated studies for creatine, folinic acid, and an amino acid combination. Mixed results were found for zinc, folic add, vitamin C, and tryptophan, with nonsignificant results for inositol. No major adverse effects were noted in the studies (aside from minor digestive disturbance). A meta-analysis of adjunctive omega-3 versus placebo revealed a significant and moderate to strong effect in favor of omega-3. Conversely, a meta analysis of folic acid revealed a nonsignificant difference from placebo. Marked study heterogeneity was found in a Higgins test for both omega-3 and folic acid studies; funnel plots also revealed asymmetry (reflecting potential study bias). Conclusions: Current evidence supports adjunctive use of SAMe, methylfolate, omega-3, and vitamin D with antidepressants to reduce depressive symptoms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available