Effort-based decision-making impairment in patients with clinically-stabilized first-episode psychosis and its relationship with amotivation and psychosocial functioning

Effort-based decision-making has recently been proposed as a potential mechanism contributing to motivational deficits (amotivation) in psychotic disorder. Previous research has identified altered effort allocation in chronic schizophrenia, but produced mixed results regarding its relationship with amotivation. No study has investigated effort allocation in first-episode psychosis (FEP). We examined effort-based decision-making in 45 clinically-stabilized FEP patients and 45 demographically-matched controls, using Effort-Expenditure for Reward Task (EEfRT) which measures allocation of physical effort for monetary reward at varying magnitude and probability levels. Our results showed that FEP patients did not demonstrate overall reduction in effort expenditure but displayed reduced willingness to expend effort for high-value/high-probability reward as compared to controls. In particular, such selective effort-related impairment was most pronounced in patients with high levels of amotivation. Furthermore, reduced allocation of greater effort for higher probability reward was related to poorer psychosocial functioning. Decreased effort exertion was generally unrelated to other symptom dimensions, self-report anhedonia, antipsychotic dose and cognitive deficits. This study thus provides the first evidence of effort-based decision-making impairment in FEP, and indicates that first-episode patients were not generally effort-averse but exhibited inefficient effort allocation by failing to make high-effort choices to maximize reward receipt. Our findings affirm the critical role of amotivation on aberrant effort allocation, and support the link between laboratory-based effort-cost measures and real-world psychosocial functioning in medicated FEP. Further longitudinal research is required to clarify trajectory of suboptimal effort allo-cation and its potential utility in predicting amotivation and functional outcomes in the early course of illness. (c) 2019 Elsevier B.V. and ECNP. All rights reserved.