4.6 Article

Nitrous oxide in vivo emission may regulate nitrogen stoichiometry in earthworm body tissues

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOIL BIOLOGY
Volume 91, Issue -, Pages 25-31

Publisher

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejsobi.2019.01.002

Keywords

Endogeic earthworm; Homeostasis; Nitrogen excretion; Urine; Mucus; Nitrous oxide emission

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada [2383823-10, RGPIN-2017-05391]
  2. IDB Merit Scholarship Program for High Technology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There is growing evidence that earthworms maintain strict homeostasis in their nitrogen (N) stoichiometry, but the mechanisms employed remain poorly understood. Herein, we examined whether the endogeic earthworm Aporrectodea turgida regulates N stoichiometry in its body (1) by changing the quantity of N excreted from urine and mucus secretion, and (2) regulating the amounts of N2O and N-2 emitted from their body by the aid of gutmicrobiota. These objectives were evaluated in a laboratory experiment using N-15-labeled adults of A. turgida and tracking the N-15 lost from their body during a 48 h period in microcosms containing soil-plant litter mixtures varying in N content and C:N ratio. The quantity of N-15 excreted by A. turgida after 48 h was about 3.7 +/- 0.3 mu g and was composed of 50% N-15-mineral N and 34% N-15-DON. The N excretion rate varied, on average, from 507 to 699 mu g N g(-1) fw d(-1) with no effect of the litter treatment (P > 0.05). It is unlikely that N release through urine and mucus regulated N stoichiometry in the body tissue of A. turgida. However, the net change in N2O production with earthworms and the quantity of N-15-N2O was 8-12 times greater in microcosms amended with the N-rich red clover than N-poor litters and the control (no litter). This suggests that in vivo N2O emission from A. turgida may regulate the N stoichiometry of its body tissues.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available