4.7 Article

Downscaling rice yield simulation at sub-field scale using remotely sensed LAI data

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY
Volume 103, Issue -, Pages 108-116

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.eja.2018.12.003

Keywords

Crop model; Data assimilation; Decision support system; Remote sensing; Yield predictions; WARM model

Categories

Funding

  1. ERMES FP7 project - European Union Seventh Framework Program (FP7/2007-2013) [606983]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Crop modeling and remote sensing are key tools to gain deeper understanding on cropping system dynamics and, ultimately, to increase the sustainability of agricultural productions. This study presents a system to estimate rice yields at sub-field scale based on the integration of a biophysical model and remotely sensed products. Leaf area index (LAI) data derived from decametric optical imageries (i.e., Landsat-8, Landsat-7 and Sentinel-2A) were assimilated into the WARM rice model via automatic recalibration of crop parameters at a fine spatial resolution (30 m x 30 m), targeting the lowest error between simulated and remotely sensed LAI. The performance of the system was evaluated by comparing simulated yield using default and recalibrated parameters at sub-field scale with yield maps generated by a GPS-equipped harvester. The training dataset included 40 paddy fields in Northern Italy, which were sampled during three cropping seasons, from 2014 to 2016. The assimilation of remotely sensed LAI into model parameters increased the accuracy of the system: MAE and RRMSE were 0.66 t ha(-1) [CI: 0.54 t ha(-1)-0.78 t ha(-1)] and 13.8% [CI: 11.7%-15.7%], respectively, whereas they were 0.82 t ha(-1) [CI: 0.68 t ha(-1)-0.96 t ha(-1)) and 15.7% [CI: 14.1%,-17.4%] without assimilation. Moreover, the system allowed to properly reproduce the within-field yield variability, thus laying the basis for possible applications in precision agriculture advisory services.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available