Correction of medication nonadherence results in better seizure outcomes than dose escalation in a novel preclinical epilepsy model of adherence

Objective Medication nonadherence directly contributes to poor seizure control. A lack of emphasis on correcting poor adherence and failures in patient adherence can result in unwarranted alterations to a patient's drug regimen. We have modeled nonadherent patients in an animal model of epilepsy to study how alterations to pharmacotherapy, made without consideration of a patient's adherence, result in changes to seizure control. Methods Newly diagnosed rats with epilepsy were treated with carbamazepine (CBZ) during a 4-week baseline period to establish their baseline seizure rate in the presence of 50% adherence. Next, animals were randomized to one of three treatment interventions and monitored for 6 weeks. Groups included: (1) no change in therapy-rats continued the 50% adherent paradigm; (2) dose escalation-the dose of CBZ was doubled, and the 50% adherent paradigm continued; and (3) nonadherence corrected-rats continued the initial dose of CBZ, but the adherence rate was adjusted to 100% (ie, fully adherent). Results The rats in the no change in therapy arm displayed a 61% increase in seizure burden over the 6-week intervention phase. Similarly, rats in the dose escalation arm had a 66% worsening of their daily seizure burden. In contrast, rats in the nonadherence corrected arm displayed a 33% reduction in their daily seizure burden; a significant improvement when compared to the normalized seizure burden scores of rats in the other two treatment arms (P < 0.01). <