4.8 Article

An Integrated Model for Input and Migration of Mercury in Chinese Coastal Sediments

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 53, Issue 5, Pages 2460-2471

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.8b06329

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDB14010400]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41803006, 41877367]
  3. CAS Interdisciplinary Innovation Team [JCTD-2018-04]
  4. Sanming Project of Medicine in Shenzhen [SZSM201811070]
  5. Tianjin Natural Science Foundation [17JCYBJC23500]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Coastal sediments are a major sink of the global mercury (Hg) biogeochemical cycle, bridging terrestrial Hg migration to the open ocean. It is thus of substantial interest to quantify the Hg contributors to coastal sediments and the extents to which the Hg sequestered into coastal sediments affects the ocean. Here, we measured concentrations and isotope compositions of Hg in Chinese coastal sediments and found that estuary sediments had distinctly higher delta Hg-202 and lower Delta Hg-199 values than marine sediments. Hg isotope compositions of marine sediments followed a latitudinal trend where delta Hg-202 decreases and Delta Hg-199 increases from north to south. An integrated model was developed based on a Hg isotope mixing model and urban distance factor (UDF), which revealed a significant difference in Hg source contributions among the estuary and marine sediments and a gradual change of dominant Hg sources from terrestrial inputs (riverine and industrial wastewater discharges) to atmospheric deposition with a decrease in urban impact. A UDF value of 306 +/- 217 was established as the critical point where dominant Hg sources started to change from terrestrial inputs to atmospheric deposition. Our study helps explain the input and migration of Hg in Chinese marginal seas and provides critical insights for targeted environmental management.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available