4.8 Article

Modeling the Effect of Relative Humidity on Adsorption Dynamics of Volatile Organic Compound onto Activated Carbon

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 53, Issue 5, Pages 2647-2659

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.8b05664

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Ford Motor Company
  2. Natural Science and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A two-dimensional heterogeneous mathematical model was developed and validated to study the effect of relative humidity on volatile organic compound (VOC) adsorption onto activated carbon. The dynamic adsorption model consists of the macroscopic mass, momentum, and energy conservation equations and includes a multicomponent adsorption isotherm to predict the competitive adsorption equilibria between VOC and water vapor, which is described by an extended Manes method. Experimental verifications show that the model predicted the breakthrough profiles during competitive adsorption of the studied VOCs (2-propanol, acetone, n-butanol, toluene, 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene) at relative humidity range 095% with an overall mean relative absolute error (MRAE) of 11.8% for dry (0% RH) conditions and 17.2% for humid (55 and 95% RH) conditions, and normalized root-mean-square error (NRMSE) of 5.5 and 8.4% for dry and humid conditions, respectively. Sensitivity analysis was also conducted to test the robustness of the model in accounting for the impact of relative humidity on VOC adsorption by varying the adsorption temperature. Good agreement was observed between the experimental and simulated results with an overall MRAE of 12.4 and 7.1% for the breakthrough profiles and adsorption capacity, respectively. The model can be used to quantify the impact of carrier gas relative humidity during adsorption of contaminants from gas streams, which is useful when optimizing adsorber design and operating conditions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available