4.7 Article

Mechanisms of a coniferous woodland persistence under drought and heat

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/ab0921

Keywords

drought; warming; die-off; precipitation; refugia

Funding

  1. Pacific Northwest National Lab's LDRD program
  2. NSF [EF-1340624, EF-1550756, EAR-1331408, DEB-1824796, DEB-1833502, IOS-1450679, IOS-1444571, IOS-1547796]
  3. Los Alamos National Laboratory
  4. Swiss National Science Foundation SNF [PZ00P3_174068]
  5. Generalitat Valenciana [BEST/2016/289]
  6. project Survive-2 from the Spanish Government [CGL2015-69773-C2-2-P MINECO/FEDER]
  7. Department of Energy, Office of Science
  8. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [PZ00P3_174068] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Predictions of warmer droughts causing increasing forest mortality are becoming abundant, yet few studies have investigated the mechanisms of forest persistence. To examine the resistance of forests to warmer droughts, we used a five-year precipitation reduction (similar to 45% removal), heat (+4 degrees C above ambient) and combined drought and heat experiment in an isolated stand of mature Pinus edulis-Juniperus monosperma. Despite severe experimental drought and heating, no trees died, and we observed only minor evidence of hydraulic failure or carbon starvation. Two mechanisms promoting survival were supported. First, access to bedrock water, or 'hydraulic refugia' aided trees in their resistance to the experimental conditions. Second, the isolation of this stand amongst a landscape of dead trees precluded ingress by Ips confusus, frequently the ultimate biotic mortality agent of pinon. These combined abiotic and biotic landscape-scale processes can moderate the impacts of future droughts on tree mortality by enabling tree avoidance of hydraulic failure, carbon starvation, and exposure to attacking abiotic agents.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available