4.6 Article

Impact of grazing, resource availability and light on prokaryotic growth and diversity in the oligotrophic surface global ocean

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 21, Issue 4, Pages 1482-1496

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1462-2920.14581

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion through project Consolider-Ingenio Malaspina 2010 [CSD2008-00077]
  2. M'OMICS-MALAN of the Spanish Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad [CTM2011-15461-E PI]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The impact of grazing, resource competition and light on prokaryotic growth and taxonomic composition in subtropical and tropical surface waters were studied through 10 microcosm experiments conducted between 30 degrees N and 30 degrees S in the Atlantic, Pacific and Indian oceans. Under natural sunlight conditions, significant changes in taxonomic composition were only observed after the reduction of grazing by sample filtration in combination with a decrease in resource competition by sample dilution. Sunlight exposure significantly reduced prokaryote growth (11 +/- 6%) and community richness (14 +/- 4%) compared to continuous darkness but did not significantly change community composition. The largest growth inhibition after sunlight exposure occurred at locations showing deep mixed layers. The reduction of grazing had an expected and significant positive effect on growth, but caused a significant decrease in community richness (16 +/- 6%), suggesting that the coexistence of many different OTUs is partly promoted by the presence of predators. Dilution of the grazer-free prokaryotic community significantly enhanced growth at the level of community, but consistently and sharply reduced the abundance of Prochlorococcus and SAR11 populations. The decline of these oligotrophic bacterial taxa following an increase in resource availability is consistent with their high specialization for exploiting the limited resources available in the oligotrophic warm ocean.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available