4.7 Article

Comparing spatial capture-recapture modeling and nest count methods to estimate orangutan densities in the Wehea Forest, East Kalimantan, Indonesia

Journal

BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION
Volume 191, Issue -, Pages 185-193

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2015.06.013

Keywords

Pongo pygmaeus morio; Population density; Camera trapping; Spatial capture-recapture models; Nest surveys

Funding

  1. Vanier Canada Graduate Scholarship
  2. Pierre Elliot Trudeau Foundation
  3. LUSH Cosmetics [CPCT026]
  4. Disney Worldwide Conservation Fund
  5. Integrated Conservation
  6. University of Wisconsin Oshkosh [FDR779]
  7. Rufford Small Grants Foundation [11266-B]
  8. Orangutan Land Trust

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Accurate information on the density and abundance of animal populations is essential for understanding species'. ecology and for conservation planning, but is difficult to obtain. The endangered orangutan (Pongo spp.) is an example; due to its elusive behavior and low densities, researchers have relied on methods that convert nest counts to orangutan densities and require substantial effort for reliable results. Camera trapping and spatial capture-recapture (SCR) models could provide an alternative but have not been used for primates. We compared density estimates calculated using the two methods for orangutans in the Wehea Forest, East Kalimantan, Indonesia. Camera trapping/SCR modeling produced a density estimate of 0.16 +/- 0.09-0.29 indiv/km(2), and nest counts produced a density estimate of 1.05 +/- 0.18-6.01 indiv/km(2). The large confidence interval of the nest count estimate is probably due to high variance in nest encounter rates, indicating the need for larger sample size and the substantial effort required to produce reliable results using this method. The SCR estimate produced a very low density estimate and had a narrower but still fairly wide confidence interval. This was likely due to unmodeled heterogeneity and small sample size, specifically a low number of individual captures and recaptures. We propose methodological fixes that could address these issues and improve precision. A comparison of the overall costs and benefits of the two methods suggests that camera trapping/SCR modeling can potentially be a useful tool for assessing the densities of orangutans and other elusive primates, and warrant further investigation to determine broad applicability and methodological adjustments needed. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available