4.6 Article

Bounding the Plausibility of Physical Theories in a Device-Independent Setting via Hypothesis Testing

Journal

ENTROPY
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/e21020185

Keywords

quantum nonlocality; Bell test; device-independent; p-value; hypothesis testing; nonsignaling

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan [104-2112-M-006-021-MY3, 107-2112-M-006-005-MY2, 107-2627-E-006-001]
  2. National Center for Theoretical Science, Taiwan (R.O.C.)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The device-independent approach to physics is one where conclusions about physical systems (and hence of Nature) are drawn directly and solely from the observed correlations between measurement outcomes. This operational approach to physics arose as a byproduct of Bell's seminal work to distinguish, via a Bell test, quantum correlations from the set of correlations allowed by local-hidden-variable theories. In practice, since one can only perform a finite number of experimental trials, deciding whether an empirical observation is compatible with some class of physical theories will have to be carried out via the task of hypothesis testing. In this paper, we show that the prediction-based-ratio methodinitially developed for performing a hypothesis test of local-hidden-variable theoriescan equally well be applied to test many other classes of physical theories, such as those constrained only by the nonsignaling principle, and those that are constrained to produce any of the outer approximation to the quantum set of correlations due to Navascues-Pironio-Acin. We numerically simulate Bell tests using hypothetical nonlocal sources of correlations to illustrate the applicability of the method in both the independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) scenario and the non-i.i.d. scenario. As a further application, we demonstrate how this method allows us to unveil an apparent violation of the nonsignaling conditions in certain experimental data collected in a Bell test. This, in turn, highlights the importance of the randomization of measurement settings, as well as a consistency check of the nonsignaling conditions in a Bell test.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available