4.7 Article

Efficient assessment of 3D train-track-bridge interaction combining multi-time-step method and moving track technique

Journal

ENGINEERING STRUCTURES
Volume 183, Issue -, Pages 290-302

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.01.036

Keywords

Train-track-bridge coupled system; Multi-time-step; Moving track technique; Computational efficiency; Riding comfort; Running safety

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51678576]
  2. National Key R&D Program of China (China) [2017YFB1201204]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of Central South University (China) [2018zzts031]
  4. China Former Railway Ministry Science and Technology R&D Program (China) [2010G004-I]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper extends the 2D multi-time-step (MTS) method previously proposed by the authors to 3D train-track-bridge dynamic analysis for evaluating in detail the running safety and riding comfort of a train. The train-track-bridge coupled system (TTBS) is separated into the train subsystem, the track subsystem, and the bridge subsystem. These subsystems are coupled by the interaction forces between them. A fine time-step is adopted for the train subsystem and the track subsystem due to the high-frequency wheel-rail contact. A coarse time-step is adopted for the bridge subsystem due to its low-frequency vibration. To reduce the number of degrees of freedom (DOFs) of the track structure, a moving track technique is applied in this paper. The train-track-bridge coupled model with the MTS method is validated by comparing the numerical results with field measurement data of a cable-stayed bridge. A numerical simulation of a train traversing a long-span cable-stayed bridge is used to demonstrate the computational efficiency and accuracy of the proposed method. It is shown that the proposed method is accurate and computationally more efficient than using a uniform time-step for the TTBS.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available