4.7 Article

Fatigue performance of welded joint between thickened-edge U-rib and deck Chock in orthotropic steel deck

Journal

ENGINEERING STRUCTURES
Volume 181, Issue -, Pages 699-710

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.10.030

Keywords

Orthotropic steel deck; Rib-to-deck welded joint; Full-scale segment specimen; Fatigue property; Fatigue evaluation; Effective notch stress

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51778533, 51578455, 51378431, 51408506, 50908192, 51178394]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2682014CX078]
  3. National Science and Technology Support Program of China [2011BAG07B03]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the fatigue performance of an innovative rib-to-deck welded joint linking the longitudinal U-rib and deck plate of orthotropic steel deck (OSD). The welded joint has an increased weld depth due to the rolled U-rib with thickened edges. Seven large-scale OSD specimens, including three conventional OSDs and four OSDs with the rolled U-ribs, were tested under static and cyclic loadings. The static loading tests indicate that the welded joint may significantly change the stress distribution around the rib-to-deck joint. Fatigue tests were carried out to investigate the damage propagation process, failure mode, and fatigue resistance. The effective notch stress method is employed to evaluate the fatigue properties and failure mechanism. For both types of the OSD specimens, the predominant failure mode was cracking at the deck weld root. The fatigue resistance of the specimens that had different U-ribs were comparable, indicating that the use of the rolled U-ribs did not significantly increase the resistance to the fatigue cracking initiated at the deck weld root. This study suggests that the evaluation of fatigue resistance must be performed based on the specific failure mode.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available