4.7 Article

Learning short-term past as predictor of window opening-related human behavior in commercial buildings

Journal

ENERGY AND BUILDINGS
Volume 185, Issue -, Pages 1-11

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.12.012

Keywords

Neural networks; Stacked input vectors; Sequence modelling; Building automation systems; Occupant behavior; Window opening

Funding

  1. RWTH Aachen University [nova0015]
  2. German Federal Ministry of Economics and Energy (BMWi) [03ET1289D]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper addresses the question of identifying the time-window in short-term past from which the information regarding the future occupant's window opening actions and resulting window states in buildings can be predicted. The addressed sequence duration was in the range between 30 and 240 time-steps of indoor climate data, where the applied temporal discretization was one minute. For that purpose, a deep neural network is trained to predict the window states, where the input sequence duration is handled as an additional hyperparameter. Eventually, the relationship between the prediction accuracy and the time lag of the predicted window state in future is analyzed. The results pointed out, that the optimal predictive performance was achieved for the case where 60 time-steps of the indoor climate data were used as input. Additionally, the results showed that very long sequences (120-240 time-steps) could be addressed efficiently, given the right hyperprameters. Hence, the use of the memory over previous hours of high resolution indoor climate data did not improve the predictive performance, when compared to the case where 30/60 min indoor sequences were used. The analysis of the prediction accuracy in the form of F1 score for the different time lag of future window states dropped from 0.51 to 0.27, when shifting the prediction target from 10 to 60 min in future. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available