4.5 Article

Damage Model and Numerical Experiment of High-Voltage Electro Pulse Boring in Granite

Journal

ENERGIES
Volume 12, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/en12040727

Keywords

electro pulse boring; shock wave model; damage model; Crack; breaking mechanism

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41672364, 41602373]
  2. Innovation Fund of Petro-China [2016D-5007-0307]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China

Ask authors/readers for more resources

High-voltage electro pulse boring (EPB) has the advantages of high rock-breaking efficiency and good wall quality, and is a new and efficient potential method of rock breaking. The EPB process is defined as random because it is affected by many factors. At present, there is no suitable physical and mathematical model to describe the process and results of rock breakage in EPB, and the conclusions reached regarding rock-breakage mechanisms are not uniform. In this study, a complete damage model of high voltage EPB in granite is established, which includes a shock wave model and a damage model of high voltage EPB in granite. The damage model is based on the Particle Flow Code two-dimensional program. Use of a damage model of EPB accommodates the complete process of high voltage EPB, from discharge to production of a shock wave, and so rock-breaking via electro pulse can be simulated and calculated. The time-varying waveforms of shock waves with different electrical parameters are simulated and calculated on the basis of the model. Different shock wave forms are loaded into the surface and internal rock in the damage geometric model of EPB granite. Then, the breakage process of the rock surface and internally, and the mechanism of rock breakage using EPB are analyzed. This study provides a scientific basis for the quantitative expression and prediction of rock fragmentation in EPB in order to improve the drilling efficiency and reduction of energy loss in the process of EPB.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available