4.5 Article

Research on Coal Pillar Malposition Distance Based on Coupling Control of Three-Field in Shallow Buried Closely Spaced Multi-Seam Mining, China

Journal

ENERGIES
Volume 12, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/en12030462

Keywords

shallow buried closely spaced multi-seam (SBCSM-S); three-field evolution; coal pillar malposition distance (CPMD); concentrated stress; uneven subsidence; ground surface fracture

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51674190]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In order to explore the rational coal pillar malposition distance (CPMD) based on coupling control of stress field, displacement field and fracture field (three-field) in shallow buried closely spaced multi-seam (SBCSM-S) mining, and realize coupling control of underground concentrated stress and ground surface fractures, taking the No. 1-2 and No. 2-2 coal seams mining in the northward east area of Ningtiaota coal mine as background, through physical simulation and theoretical analysis, the three-field evolution in SBCSM-S mining was analysed, the effect of different CPMD on coal pillar concentrated stress, ground surface subsidence and fractures development was revealed, and the rational CPMD based on coupling control of three-field was put forward. The results show that the concentrated fractures and concentrated stress are due to the strata's uneven subsidence by coal pillars. Rational arrangement of CPMD can avoid the superposition of vertical stress caused by upper and lower coal pillars and reduce the development of ground fractures and uneven subsidence. Two theoretical models were established: one was based on the control of a concentrated stress field, the other on the control of the displacement and fracture fields. These results will be applied in a follow-up arrangement at the Ningtiaota coal mine, and can provide a new way for safe and green mining in SBCSM-S.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available