4.2 Article

Increased sexual dimorphism in dense populations of Olive-backed Sunbirds on small islands: morphological niche contraction in females but not males

Journal

EMU-AUSTRAL ORNITHOLOGY
Volume 119, Issue 3, Pages 296-307

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS AUSTRALIA
DOI: 10.1080/01584197.2019.1588743

Keywords

Sexual dimorphism; island biogeography; competition; Indo-West Pacific; morphological niche; density compensation

Categories

Funding

  1. Irish Research Council [13046]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Competition takes place not only between species but also within them. Intersexual competition for resources may increase sexual dimorphism in body size to minimise ecological niche overlap. Change in the level of sexual dimorphism in a species is a common feature of island radiations. This is often interpreted as ecological release from interspecific competitors absent from small islands, allowing niche expansion by both sexes of a dimorphic species. The Olive-backed Sunbird (Cinnyris jugularis) is a widespread island-colonising species found throughout the Indo-West Pacific. Here we investigate sexual dimorphism in morphological niche of Olive-backed Sunbird populations in South-east Sulawesi, Indonesia. We found decreased overlap in morphological niche between females and males on the species-depauperate Wakatobi Islands, in comparison to mainland Sulawesi and its larger continental islands, indicating greater sexual dimorphism on the small islands. This change in sexual dimorphism was associated with a decrease in the morphological niche hypervolume of females, but no change in males. Therefore there was no indication of expansion of morphological niche space in the absence of mainland competitors. These morphological differences were associated with the significantly higher population density of Wakatobi Olive-backed Sunbirds. Therefore this increased sexual dimorphism may serve to alleviate intraspecific competition for resources.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available