4.5 Article

Stiffness measurement of nanosized liposomes using solid-state nanopore sensor with automated recapturing platform

Journal

ELECTROPHORESIS
Volume 40, Issue 9, Pages 1337-1344

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/elps.201800476

Keywords

Liposome; Nanoparticle; Recapturing platform; Solid-state nanopore; Stiffness

Funding

  1. National Institute of Health [R03EB022759]
  2. National Science Foundation [1712069]
  3. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn
  4. Directorate For Engineering [1712069] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper describes a method to gauge the stiffness of nanosized liposomes - a nanoscale vesicle - using a custom-made recapture platform coupled to a solid-state nanopore sensor. The recapture platform electrically profiles a given liposome vesicle multiple times through automated reversal of the voltage polarity immediately following a translocation instance to re-translocate the same analyte through the nanopore - provides better statistical insight at the molecular level by analyzing the same particle multiple times compared to conventional nanopore platforms. The capture frequency depends on the applied voltage with lower voltages (i.e., 100mV) permitting higher recapture instances than at higher voltages (>200mV) since the probability of particles exiting the nanopore capture radius increases with voltage. The shape deformation was inferred by comparing the normalized relative current blockade (I/I0) at the two voltage polarities to that of a rigid particle, i.e., polystyrene beads. We found that liposomes deform to adopt a prolate shape at higher voltages. This platform can be further applied to investigate the stiffness of other types of soft matters, e.g., virus, exosomes, endosomes, and accelerate the potential studies in pharmaceutics for increasing the drug packing and unpacking mechanism by controlling the stiffness of the drug vesicles.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available