4.8 Article

Traits linked with species invasiveness and community invasibility vary with time, stage and indicator of invasion in a long-term grassland experiment

Journal

ECOLOGY LETTERS
Volume 22, Issue 4, Pages 593-604

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ele.13220

Keywords

Cedar Creek Ecosystem Science Reserve; ecosystem invasibility; functional traits; indicators of invasion; invasion stages; long-term grassland experiment; seed addition experiment; species invasiveness

Categories

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council [DE120102221]
  2. ARC Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions
  3. US National Science Foundation Long-Term Ecological Research Program [DEB-0620652, DEB-1234162]
  4. Cedar Creek Ecosystem Science Reserve
  5. University of Minnesota

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Much uncertainty remains about traits linked with successful invasion - the establishment and spread of non-resident species into existing communities. Using a 20-year experiment, where 50 non-resident (but mostly native) grassland plant species were sown into savannah plots, we ask how traits linked with invasion depend on invasion stage (establishment, spread), indicator of invasion success (occupancy, relative abundance), time, environmental conditions, propagule rain, and traits of invaders and invaded communities. Trait data for 164 taxa showed that invader occupancy was primarily associated with traits of invaders, traits of recipient communities, and invader-community interactions. Invader abundance was more strongly associated with community traits (e.g. proportion legume) and trait differences between invaders and the most similar resident species. Annuals and invaders with high-specific leaf area were only successful early in stand development, whereas invaders with conservative carbon capture strategies persisted long-term. Our results indicate that invasion is context-dependent and long-term experiments are required to comprehensively understand invasions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available