4.6 Article

Soil gross nitrogen transformations are related to land-uses in two agroforestry systems

Journal

ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING
Volume 127, Issue -, Pages 431-439

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2018.12.022

Keywords

Gross nitrogen transformation; N-15 dilution technique; Land-use type; Hedgerow; Shelterbelt

Funding

  1. China Opportunity Fund at the University of Alberta
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41301345, 41101284, 31560107]
  3. China Scholarship Council [201409040013]
  4. Jiangsu Government Scholarship for Overseas Studies

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A better understanding of gross nitrogen (N) transformation rates in agroforestry systems is crucial for testing the land use management effects on soil N retention. In this study, gross N transformation rates in forest and adjacent agricultural soils in two agroforestry systems, hedgerow and shelterbelt, located near Edmonton, Alberta, Canada were investigated using the N-15 labeled technique and a numerical model, FLUAZ. Gross N mineralization rates in the forested land use were higher than that in the agricultural land use for hedgerow and shelterbelt agroforestry system, and the pattern was the same for gross N immobilization rates. However, gross nitrification rates in the forested land use were lower than that in the agricultural land use for both agroforestry systems. The ratios of gross nitrification to ammonium immobilization rates and the ratios of gross N mineralization to immobilization rates in the agricultural land use were higher than that in the forested land use irrespective of the type of agroforestry system studied. Our study suggested that the agricultural land use had a lower potential to conserve N, posing a higher risk of N loss, whereas mineralization and immobilization processes were tightly coupled in the forested land use, leaving less N available for nitrification and subsequent N loss to the environment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available