4.5 Article

Effect of hot-air oven dehydration process on water dynamics and microstructure of apple (Fuji) cultivar slices assessed by LF-NMR and MRI

Journal

DRYING TECHNOLOGY
Volume 37, Issue 15, Pages 1974-1987

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/07373937.2018.1547312

Keywords

Apple; dehydration; water dynamics; LF-NMR; MRI; SEM

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Non-destructive analysis of water dynamics during drying is of importance for quality control of food products. In this study, different water dynamics and migration in Fuji apple slices dried at various hot-air oven temperatures, i.e. 50, 60, 70, and 80 degrees C and air velocity at 0.2 m/s were monitored using low-field nuclear magnetic resonance (LF-NMR) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Multi-exponential fitting of the transverse relaxation T-2 parameter demonstrated four distinct water peaks in all samples corresponding to strongly bound, lightly bound, entrapped/immobilized, and free water as follows: T-21 in the range of 0.01-1 ms, T-22 in the range of 1-10 ms, T-23 in the range of 10-100 ms, and T-24 in the range of 100-1000 ms, respectively. The water content was measured and analyzed by the traditional technique using the oven drying method. The overall results were highly significant, depicting that the transverse relaxation times T-24, signal per mass of the free water A(24), and water content significantly decreased (p< 0.05), while the color (L*, a*, b*) and shear force (SF) curves increased with extended drying. Furthermore, good correlations were observed between the LF-NMR parameters and color, water content, and SF in differently processed samples during the dehydration process. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and MRI provided the structural changes and spatial water distributions during the drying process. LF-NMR exhibited great potential in evaluating the various water dynamics and quality of Fuji cultivar apples during the drying process.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available