4.7 Article

Single cell analysis of adult mouse skeletal muscle stem cells in homeostatic and regenerative conditions

Journal

DEVELOPMENT
Volume 146, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

COMPANY BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/dev.174177

Keywords

Muscle stem cells; Satellite cells; Single cell RNA-seq; Muscle regeneration; Mouse

Funding

  1. National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Intramural Research Program [AR041126, AR041164]
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ARTHRITIS AND MUSCULOSKELETAL AND SKIN DISEASES [ZICAR041207, ZIAAR041126] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Dedicated stem cells ensure postnatal growth, repair and homeostasis of skeletal muscle. Following injury, muscle stem cells (MuSCs) exit from quiescence and divide to reconstitute the stem cell pool and give rise to muscle progenitors. The transcriptomes of pooled MuSCs have provided a rich source of information for describing the genetic programs of distinct static cell states; however, bulk microarray and RNA sequencing provide only averaged gene expression profiles, blurring the heterogeneity and developmental dynamics of asynchronous MuSC populations. Instead, the granularity required to identify distinct cell types, states, and their dynamics can be afforded by single cell analysis. We were able to compare the transcriptomes of thousands of MuSCs and primary myoblasts isolated from homeostatic or regenerating muscles by single cell RNA sequencing. Using computational approaches, we could reconstruct dynamic trajectories and place, in a pseudotemporal manner, the transcriptomes of individual MuSC within these trajectories. This approach allowed for the identification of distinct clusters of MuSCs and primary myoblasts with partially overlapping but distinct transcriptional signatures, as well as the description of metabolic pathways associated with defined MuSC states.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available