4.5 Review

From cytoskeletal assemblies to living materials

Journal

CURRENT OPINION IN CELL BIOLOGY
Volume 56, Issue -, Pages 109-114

Publisher

CURRENT BIOLOGY LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceb.2018.10.010

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. PLS fellowship of the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation [GBMF4513]
  2. National Science Foundation [PHY-1305254, PHY-0847188, DMR-0820484, DBI-0959721]
  3. National Institutes of Health
  4. Lyttle Chair of Applied Mathematics
  5. Kavli Institute for Bionano Science and Technology at Harvard University
  6. National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Many subcellular structures contain large numbers of cytoskeletal filaments. Such assemblies underlie much of cell division, motility, signaling, metabolism, and growth. Thus, understanding cell biology requires understanding the properties of networks of cytoskeletal filaments. While there are well established disciplines in biology dedicated to studying isolated proteins - their structure (Structural Biology) and behaviors (Biochemistry) - it is much less clear how to investigate, or even just describe, the structure and behaviors of collections of cytoskeletal filaments. One approach is to use methodologies from Mechanics and Soft Condensed Matter Physics, which have been phenomenally successful in the domains where they have been traditionally applied. From this perspective, collections of cytoskeletal filaments are viewed as materials, albeit very complex, 'active' materials, composed of molecules which use chemical energy to perform mechanical work. A major challenge is to relate these material level properties to the behaviors of the molecular constituents. Here we discuss this materials perspective and review recent work bridging molecular and network scale properties of the cytoskeleton, focusing on the organization of microtubules by dynein as an illustrative example.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available