4.8 Review

The application of different typological and structural MOFs-based materials for the dyes adsorption

Journal

COORDINATION CHEMISTRY REVIEWS
Volume 380, Issue -, Pages 471-483

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.ccr.2018.11.002

Keywords

Metal-organic framework; Dyes; Adsorption; Multidimensional; Mechanism

Funding

  1. Program for the National Natural Science Foundation of China [51879101, 51579098, 51779090, 51709101, 51521006, 51809090, 51278176, 51378190, 51508177]
  2. National Program for Support of Top-Notch Young Professionals of China (2014)
  3. Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University [IRT-13R17]
  4. Hunan Provincial Science and Technology Plan Project [2018SK20410, 2017SK2243, 2016RS3026]
  5. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [531109200027, 531107051080, 531107050978]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Dye wastewater is an universal problem that restricts sustainable development. Adsorption is an effective technique for water purification due to high efficiency, economic feasibility and operational ease. Metal organic frameworks (MOFs) as adsorbent has attracted great attention due to exceptionally high porosity, compositional and structural diversity, and highly tunable pore shape/size and surface functionality. This review focused on recent progress in different typological and structural MOFs as superior adsorbents for the efficient removal of toxic dyes. Optimized, modified, defective, compositive and derived MOFs could improve the adsorption performance of MOFs. In particular, some MOFs-based adsorbents with special structure were concerned. The interactions between dyes and MOFs-based materials are systematically summarized, including adsorption performance, kinetics, thermodynamics and mechanism. Finally, we propose our personal insights to the development of MOFs-based adsorbent better used for environmental pollution management. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available