4.7 Article

Effects of nano-SiO2 and glass powder on mitigating alkali-silica reaction of cement glass mortars

Journal

CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS
Volume 201, Issue -, Pages 295-302

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.12.186

Keywords

Alkali-silica reaction; Nano-SiO2; Waste glass powder; Waste glass cullet; Pozzolanic materials

Funding

  1. Environment and Conservation Fund
  2. Hong Kong Polytechnic University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Swelling caused by alkali-silica reaction (ASR) in concrete is a deleterious behavior due to reactions between alkaline pore solution and amorphous or metastable forms of silica in aggregates. Generally, mitigation by using pozzolanic materials is commonly adopted. This study compared the effectiveness of a highly-reactive nano-SiO2 (NS) and a slowly-reactive waste glass powder (WGP) on mitigating ASR of cement mortars prepared with crushed glass cullet as aggregates. The experimental results showed that incorporating 2% NS or 10% WGP or a hybrid of the two in the mortar can decrease the ASR expansion. Using WGP resulted in larger reduction in the ASR expansion than using NS. Meanwhile, there was an improvement of strength from 7 d to 28 d for the mortar prepared with WGP. The composition of reaction products containing the ASR gel formed in a simulated ASR condition and the macro-/micro-structure of the tested mortars were further analyzed. It was found that the reaction products formed with high ratios of Na/Si and Ca/Si were favorable in mitigating the ASR expansion. For the specimen prepared with WGP, the increase in the ratio of Ca/Si would increase the stiffness of the ASR gel, and a higher Na/Si ratio would help reduce the osmotic pressure. The findings from this study would be useful for the selection of pozzolans to mitigate the ASR effect when using crushed glass cullet as aggregates in cement mortars. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available