4.3 Article

Cascaded statistical shape model based segmentation of the full lower limb in CT

Journal

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2019.1577828

Keywords

Image segmentation; lower limb; computed tomography; statistical shape model

Funding

  1. Research Foundation Flanders [11V2215N]
  2. Research Foundation Flanders
  3. VLAIO (FWO Flanders) innovation grant

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Image segmentation has become an important tool in orthopedic and biomechanical research. However, it greatly remains a time-consuming and laborious task. In this manuscript, we propose a fully automatic model-based segmentation pipeline for the full lower limb in computed tomography (CT) images. The method relies on prior shape model fitting, followed by a gradient-defined free from deformation. The technique allows for the generation of anatomically corresponding surface meshes, which can subsequently be applied in anatomical and mechanical simulation studies. Starting from an initial, small (n <= 10) sample of manual segmentations, the model is continuously updated and refined with newly segmented training samples. Validation of the segmentation pipeline was performed by comparing the automatic segmentations against corresponding manual segmentations. Convergence of the segmentation pipeline was obtained in 250 cases and failed in three samples. The average distance error ranged from 0.53 to 0.76 mm and maximal error ranged from 2.0 to 7.8 mm for the 7 different osteological structures that were investigated. The accuracy of the shape model-based segmentation gradually increased as the number of training shapes in the updated population also increased. When optimized with the free form deformation, however, average segmentation accuracy rapidly plateaued from already as little as 20 training samples on. The maximum segmentation error plateaued from 100 training samples on.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available