4.2 Review

A Technical Review of Convolutional Neural Network-Based Mammographic Breast Cancer Diagnosis

Journal

Publisher

HINDAWI LTD
DOI: 10.1155/2019/6509357

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Develop Program of China [2016YFC0105102]
  2. Leading Talent of Special Support Project in Guangdong [2016TX03R139]
  3. Fundamental Research Program of Shenzhen [JCYJ20170413162458312]
  4. Science Foundation of Guangdong [2017B020229002, 2015B020233011, 2014A030312006]
  5. Beijing Center for Mathematics and Information Interdisciplinary Sciences
  6. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61871374]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study reviews the technique of convolutional neural network (CNN) applied in a specific field of mammographic breast cancer diagnosis (MBCD). It aims to provide several clues on how to use CNN for related tasks. MBCD is a long-standing problem, and massive computer-aided diagnosis models have been proposed. The models of CNN-based MBCD can be broadly categorized into three groups. One is to design shallow or to modify existing models to decrease the time cost as well as the number of instances for training; another is to make the best use of a pretrained CNN by transfer learning and fine-tuning; the third is to take advantage of CNN models for feature extraction, and the differentiation of malignant lesions from benign ones is fulfilled by using machine learning classifiers. This study enrolls peer-reviewed journal publications and presents technical details and pros and cons of each model. Furthermore, the findings, challenges and limitations are summarized and some clues on the future work are also given. Conclusively, CNN-based MBCD is at its early stage, and there is still a long way ahead in achieving the ultimate goal of using deep learning tools to facilitate clinical practice. This review benefits scientific researchers, industrial engineers, and those who are devoted to intelligent cancer diagnosis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available