4.5 Article

Subgame Perfect Equilibrium in the Rubinstein Bargaining Game with Loss Aversion

Journal

COMPLEXITY
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-HINDAWI
DOI: 10.1155/2019/5108652

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71671188]
  2. Beijing Intelligent Logistics System Collaborative Innovation Center [BILSCIC-2018KF-04]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province, China [2016JJ1024]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Rubinstein bargaining game is extended to incorporate loss aversion, where the initial reference points are not zero. Under the assumption that the highest rejected proposal of the opponent last periods is regarded as the associated reference point, we investigate the effect of loss aversion and initial reference points on subgame perfect equilibrium. Firstly, a subgame perfect equilibrium is constructed. And its uniqueness is shown. Furthermore, we analyze this equilibrium with respect to initial reference points, loss aversion coefficients, and discount factor. It is shown that one benefits from his opponent's loss aversion coefficient and his own initial reference point and is hurt by loss aversion coefficient of himself and the opponent's initial reference point. Moreover, it is found that, for a player who has a higher level of loss aversion than the other, although this player has a higher initial reference point than the opponent, this player can(not) obtain a high share of the pie if the level of loss aversion of this player is sufficiently low (high). Finally, a relation with asymmetric Nash bargaining is established, where player's bargaining power is negatively related to his own loss aversion and the initial reference point of the other and positively related to loss aversion of the opponent and his own initial reference point.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available