4.5 Article

The effect of an oral ginger supplementation on NF-κB concentration in peripheral blood mononuclear cells and anthropomorphic data of patients with type 2 diabetes: A randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial

Journal

COMPLEMENTARY THERAPIES IN MEDICINE
Volume 42, Issue -, Pages 7-11

Publisher

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ctim.2018.10.019

Keywords

Type 2 diabetes; NP-kappa B; Ginger; Inflammation; Clinical trial

Funding

  1. Tehran University of Medical Sciences [94-01-161-28653]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: The complications of diabetes are extensive which can be caused by excessive oxidative stress, inflammation and impaired insulin system. Plant-sourced bioactive compounds can reduce inflammation and oxidative stress. The aim of present study was to determine the effect of ginger supplementation on diabetic complications. Methods: The present study is a randomized double blind clinical trial which is conducted with 48 diabetic patients. The participants were randomly divided into two intervention and placebo groups which were received 2 g ginger powder and 2 g wheat flour respectively for 10 weeks. Nuclear factor kappa B (NF-kappa B) concentration and anthropometric measurements were evaluated at the baseline and at the end of study. Results: The effect of ginger supplementation on hip circumference was marginal and there was no significant effect on BMI and waist circumference. Mean NF-kappa B p65 concentrations were reduced in ginger supplementation group, however, the amount was not statistically significant. Conclusion: Ginger supplementation had significant effects on anthropometric evaluations. Ginger supplementation decreased mean NF-kappa B concentration in comparison with placebo, however the significance level was marginal. In order to achieve reliable information, more researches should be complemented with uptake of other diagnostic tools.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available