4.1 Article

Rising Sea Levels: Helping Decision-Makers Confront the Inevitable

Journal

COASTAL MANAGEMENT
Volume 47, Issue 2, Pages 127-150

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/08920753.2019.1551012

Keywords

coastal risk management; extreme water levels; managing uncertainty; regiona; local sea-level rise scenarios; risk-based approach

Funding

  1. Rhodium Group, Climate Impact Lab consortium
  2. National Science Foundation [ICER-1663807]
  3. National Aeronautics and Space Administration [80NSSC17K0698]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sea-level rise (SLR) is not just a future trend; it is occurring now in most coastal regions across the globe. It thus impacts not only long-range planning in coastal environments, but also emergency preparedness. Its inevitability and irreversibility on long time scales, in addition to its spatial non-uniformity, uncertain magnitude and timing, and capacity to drive non-stationarity in coastal flooding on planning and engineering timescales, create unique challenges for coastal risk-management decision processes. This review assesses past United States federal efforts to synthesize evolving SLR science in support of coastal risk management. In particular, it outlines the: (1) evolution in global SLR scenarios to those using a risk-based perspective that also considers low-probability but high-consequence outcomes, (2) regionalization of the global scenarios, and (3) use of probabilistic approaches. It also describes efforts to further contextualize regional scenarios by combining local mean sea-level changes with extreme water level projections. Finally, it offers perspectives on key issues relevant to the future uptake, interpretation, and application of sea-level change scenarios in decision-making. These perspectives have utility for efforts to craft standards and guidance for preparedness and resilience measures to reduce the risk of coastal flooding and other impacts related to SLR.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available