4.5 Review

Efficacy of autogenous teeth for the reconstruction of alveolar ridge deficiencies: a systematic review

Journal

CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS
Volume 23, Issue 12, Pages 4263-4287

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00784-019-02869-1

Keywords

Systematic review; Bone augmentation; Autogenous tooth; Regeneration

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aim The aim of this systematic review was to critically evaluate the currently existing clinical evidence on the efficacy of autogenous teeth (AT) for the reconstruction of alveolar ridge deficiencies. Materials and methods A search protocol was developed to answer the focused question: In patients exhibiting alveolar ridge deficiencies and being in need of an implant retained restoration, what is the efficacy of reconstructive procedures employing AT on changes in ridge dimensions compared with control measures? Uncontrolled studies were also included to assess the overall efficacy of AT for specific procedures. Results A total of six studies (one randomized, one non-randomized controlled, two observational, one controlled case series, one retrospective) were identified. Two studies used AT for staged lateral augmentation, whereas four studies used AT as a demineralized dentin matrix (AutoBT) for the simultaneous grafting of dehiscence-type defects, vertical augmentation of post-extraction sockets, and lateral/transcrestal sinus floor elevation. The reported clinical outcomes following the application of either AT or AutoBT were within the range of those data noted in the respective control groups. Adverse events were commonly not observed. Conclusions The available limited studies involved relatively small patient samples and short follow-up periods but pointed to the potential of AT to serve as an alternative material for the reconstruction of alveolar ridge deficiencies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available