Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Evaluation of Operating Time and Patient Perception Using Conventional Impression Taking and Intraoral Scanning for Crown Manufacture: A Split-Mouth, Randomized Clinical Study
Yasser Haddadi et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS (2018)
Fitting accuracy of zirconia single crowns produced via digital and conventional impressions-a clinical comparative study
Matthias Roediger et al.
CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS (2017)
Influence of abutment tooth geometry on the accuracy of conventional. and digital methods of obtaining dental impressions
Jeison B. Carbajal Mejia et al.
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY (2017)
Evaluation of the accuracy of 7 digital scanners: An in vitro analysis based on 3-dimensional comparisons
Walter Renne et al.
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY (2017)
Clinical marginal fit of zirconia crowns and patients' preferences for impression techniques using intraoral digital scanner versus polyvinyl siloxane material
Nawapat Sakornwimon et al.
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY (2017)
Randomized controlled within-subject evaluation of digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of lithium disilicate single crowns. Part Ill: marginal and internal fit
Marco Zeltner et al.
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY (2017)
Evaluation of the accuracy and precision of four intraoral scanners with 70% reduced inlay and four-unit bridge models of international standard
Soo-Hyuk Uhm et al.
DENTAL MATERIALS JOURNAL (2017)
Patient-centered outcomes comparing digital and conventional implant impression procedures: a randomized crossover trial
Tim Joda et al.
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH (2016)
Evaluation of fit and efficiency of CAD/CAM fabricated all-ceramic restorations based on direct and indirect digitalization: a double-blinded, randomized clinical trial
Danush Ahrberg et al.
CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS (2016)
Intraoral Digital Impression Technique Compared to Conventional Impression Technique. A Randomized Clinical Trial
Bjorn Gjelvold et al.
JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY (2016)
Influence of conventional and digital intraoral impressions on the fit of CAD/CAM-fabricated all-ceramic crowns
S. Berrendero et al.
Clinical Oral Investigations (2016)
Accuracy of intraoral and extraoral digital data acquisition for dental restorations
Heike Rudolph et al.
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ORAL SCIENCE (2016)
Comparison of marginal and internal fit of 3-unit ceramic fixed dental prostheses made with either a conventional or digital impression
Ting-Shu Su et al.
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY (2016)
Accuracy of single-tooth restorations based on intraoral digital and conventional impressions in patients
Moritz Boeddinghaus et al.
CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS (2015)
Digital versus analog complete-arch impressions for single-unit premolar implant crowns: Operating time and patient preference
Ulf Schepke et al.
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY (2015)
Patients' preferences when comparing analogue implant impressions using a polyether impression material versus digital impressions (Intraoral Scan) of dental implants
Daniel Wismeijer et al.
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH (2014)
Comparison of digital and conventional impression techniques: evaluation of patients' perception, treatment comfort, effectiveness and clinical outcomes
Emir Yuzbasioglu et al.
BMC ORAL HEALTH (2014)
The future of dental devices is digital
Richard van Noort
DENTAL MATERIALS (2012)
A review of dental CAD/CAM: current status and future perspectives from 20 years of experience
Takashi Miyazaki et al.
DENTAL MATERIALS JOURNAL (2009)
Clinical evaluation of the marginal fit of cast crowns - validation of the silicone replica method
M. Laurent et al.
JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION (2008)
Clinical fit of Procera AllCeram crowns
KW Boening et al.
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY (2000)
Share Paper
