4.7 Review

Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii: in pursuit of an effective treatment

Journal

CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION
Volume 25, Issue 8, Pages 951-957

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2019.03.014

Keywords

Acinetobacter baumannii; carbapenem resistance; extensive drug resistance; HAV/VAP; treatment

Funding

  1. EU project AIDA [Health-F3-2011-278348]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) has gained global notoriety as a critically important nosocomial pathogen. It mostly affects debilitated patients, causing pneumonia and bloodstream infections with high mortality rates. Difficulties in treating CRAB infections stem from a formidable resistance profile that leaves available only a few antibiotics of uncertain efficacy such as colistin and tigecycline. Despite the relentless attempts to improve therapeutic approaches (as depicted in colistin-oriented randomized clinical trials and the numerous observational studies), progress is still limited. Aims: We aim (a) to assist physicians to adapt therapeutic approaches in CRAB infections by considering all potentially available antimicrobials, and (b) to present directions for future investigations that emerge through treatment efforts in endemic settings. Sources: Articles and reviews from PubMed and Scopus databases; studies from ClinicalTrials.gov; presentations from ECCMID congresses and IDWeek meetings. Content: The review provides a succinct overview of the important pharmacokinetic/pharmocodynamic parameters of relevant antimicrobial agents, a critical appraisal of randomized control trials and observational studies, suggestions for increasing the strength of observational studies and directions facilitating the choice of therapeutic regimens by severity of infection and status of the host. (C) 2019 European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available