4.5 Article

Nasal IgE production in allergic rhinitis: Impact of rhinovirus infection

Journal

CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ALLERGY
Volume 49, Issue 6, Pages 847-852

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/cea.13372

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [AI20565, R56 AI120055, UO1 AI100799, UO1 AI123337]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BackgroundRhinovirus (RV) infections exacerbate asthma in part by enhancing an allergic state, and these exacerbations can be mitigated via administration of anti-IgE. ObjectiveWe investigated the presence of local IgE production in the nose of allergic and non-allergic subjects and assessed whether this was enhanced by RV. MethodsLocal production of specific IgE was determined by comparing ratios of specific to total IgE concentrations between nasal and serum samples. Our initial studies were performed in subjects presenting to the emergency department for allergic and non-allergic respiratory complaints. Subsequently, we investigated influences of experimental RV infection on nasal sIgE production in an allergic cohort. ResultsWe found evidence of local sIgE production to Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus in 30.3% and to Blomia tropicalis in 14.6% of allergic subjects. None of the non-allergic subjects demonstrated local IgE. Subjects with active RV infection were more than twice as likely to have local sIgE (45% vs 14%), and subjects with local sIgE being produced were 3 times more likely to be having an asthma exacerbation. Experimental RV infection was able to induce local sIgE production. ConclusionThese studies confirm local IgE production in a large subset of allergic subjects and demonstrate that allergic asthmatics with local IgE are more likely to develop an asthma exacerbation when infected with RV. Our RV challenge studies demonstrate that at least some allergic asthmatics can be induced to secrete locally generated IgE in their nasal airway after RV infection.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available