4.5 Article

Elevated Serum Elaidic Acid Predicts Risk of Repeat Revascularization After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Japan

Journal

CIRCULATION JOURNAL
Volume 83, Issue 5, Pages 1032-1038

Publisher

JAPANESE CIRCULATION SOC
DOI: 10.1253/circj.CJ-18-1175

Keywords

Coronary artery disease; Elaidic acid; Target lesion revascularization; Trans-fatty acid

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan [JP18K08073]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Trans-fatty acid (TFA) intake increases the risk of coronary artery disease (CAD). Our previous cross-sectional survey showed that middle-aged patients with CAD in Japan have elevated serum TFA. In this study, we longitudinally investigated whether elevated TFA is a risk factor in the secondary prevention of CAD for the same-age patients. Methods and Results: A total of 112 patients (age, 21-66 years) who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention were followed up for up to 2 years. Serum elaidic acid was measured using gas chromatography/mass spectrometry as a marker of TFA intake and divided into quartiles. The primary endpoint was ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR). The hazard ratio (HR) for TLR increased significantly with higher serum elaidic acid (P<0.01). The significant positive trend remained unchanged after adjusting for conventional lipid profile and bare-metal stent usage. In contrast, although triglycerides and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol were positively correlated with elaidic acid, they were not associated with TLR. On multivariable Cox proportional hazard analysis, elevated elaidic acid was independently associated with TLR risk after adjusting for conventional coronary risks (HR, 10.7, P<0.01). Conclusions: Elevated elaidic acid is associated with higher TLR rate in middle-aged patients with CAD, suggesting that excessive TFA intake is becoming a serious health problem in Japan.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available