4.5 Article

Water-selective hybrid membranes with improved interfacial compatibility from mussel-inspired dopamine-modified alginate and covalent organic frameworks

Journal

CHINESE JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING
Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages 90-97

Publisher

CHEMICAL INDUSTRY PRESS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cjche.2019.03.007

Keywords

Alginate; Dopamine; Covalent organic framework; Membrane; Pervaporation; Interface

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21621004, 21490583, 21878215, 21878216]
  2. Program of Introducing Talents of Discipline to Universities [B06006]
  3. State Key Laboratory of Organic-Inorganic Composites [oic-201801003]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hybrid membranes combining the merits of both polymer matrices and fillers have drawn extensive attention. The rational design of polymer-filler interface in hybrid membranes is vitally important for reducing the occurrence of void defects. Herein, imine-type covalent organic frameworks (COFs) were selected as the fillers due to their totally organic nature and multi-functionalities. Mussel-inspired dopamine-modified sodium alginate (AlgDA) was synthesized as the polymer matrix. The dopamine modification significantly improves the AlgDA-COF compatibility, which enhances the COF content up to 50 wt% in the hybrid membranes. The improved interfacial compatibility enhances the membrane separation selectivity. Accordingly, when utilized for dehydration of ethanol/water mixed solution (water concentration of 10 wt%), the hybrid membrane reveals high water concentration of similar to 98.7 wt% in permeate, and stable permeation flux larger than 1500 g.m(-2).h(-1). This work might afford useful insights for fabricating hybrid membranes with high separation selectivity by optimizing the polymer-filler interface. (C) 2019 The Chemical Industry and Engineering Society of China, and Chemical Industry Press Co., Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available