4.7 Article

Quasi-QSAR for predicting the cell viability of human lung and skin cells exposed to different metal oxide nanomaterials

Journal

CHEMOSPHERE
Volume 217, Issue -, Pages 243-249

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.11.014

Keywords

metal oxide nanomaterial; BEAS-2B; HaCaT; Cell viability; Quasi-QSAR; Quasi-SMILES

Funding

  1. Industrial Strategic Technology Development Program - Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy (MOTIE) of Korea [10043929]
  2. Bio & Medical Technology Development Program of the National Research Foundation (NRF) - Ministry of Science ICT [2017M3A9G8084539]
  3. Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT) [10043929] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A quasi-QSAR model was developed to predict the cell viability of human lung (BEAS-2B) and skin (HaCaT) cells exposed to 21 types of metal oxide nanomaterials. A wide range of toxicity datasets obtained from the S2NANO (www.s2nano.org ) database was used. The data of descriptors representing the physicochemical properties and experimental conditions were coded to quasi-SMILES. In particular, hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA) and min-max normalization method were respectively used in assigning alphanumeric codes for numerical descriptors (e.g., core size, hydrodynamic size, surface charge, and dose) and then quasi-QSAR model performances for both methods were compared. The quasi-Q$AR models were developed using CORAL software (www.insilico.euicoral). Quasi-QSAR model built using quasi-SMILES generated by means of HCA showed better performance than the min-max normalization method. The model showed satisfactory statistical results (R-adj(2) for the training dataset: 0.71-0.73; R-adj(2) for the calibration dataset: 0.74-0.82; and R-adj(2) for the validation dataset: 0.70-0.76). (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available