4.5 Article

Achieving Olfactory Expertise: Training for Transfer in Odor Identification

Journal

CHEMICAL SENSES
Volume 44, Issue 3, Pages 197-203

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bjz007

Keywords

memory; mixtures; perceptual learning; smell; transfer effect

Funding

  1. Swedish Foundation for the Humanities and Social Sciences [M14-0375: 1]
  2. Marianne and Marcus Wallenberg Foundation [MMW 2014: 0178]
  3. Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation [KAW 2016: 0229]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Human olfactory function requires the identification of everyday odors. A characteristic feature of olfaction is that most people find it hard to identify and name common odors, and when odors are presented simultaneously in mixtures, performance is even further compromised. Few studies have systematically assessed how training might enhance identification of single odors and mixtures. This study compared how odor identification training with either single odors or binary mixtures affected identification performance, as well as transfer effects to untrained tasks and odors. Twenty- seven healthy participants (22 F; 28.0 +/- 4.7 years old) completed identification training of 8 odors using a list of 16 veridical names. The study included 8 training sessions, as well as pretest and posttest evaluations. Results suggest notable effects of learning, as well as transfer to novel tasks and odors. Overall, training with single odors led to slightly better results than the binary mixture condition, suggesting that in novices, odor identification may be facilitated via consolidation of single odor objects, before learning to dissociate binary mixtures. Overall, odor identification may be trained to generate transfer of learning, although transfer effects were observed in both training methods. Our work suggests that odor identification abilities, while often limited, are highly trainable.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available