4.7 Article

V2O5-modified Mn-Ce/AC catalyst with high SO2 tolerance for low-temperature NH3-SCR of NO

Journal

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
Volume 370, Issue -, Pages 810-821

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2019.03.225

Keywords

Low-temperature; Selective catalytic reduction; NO removal; V2O5 modified Mn-Ce/AC; SO2 tolerance

Funding

  1. Fund of Chongqing Science and Technology [cstc2017shms-zdyfx0055, cstc2016zdcy-ztzx20001]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51604048, 51874058]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Development of the efficient catalysts with high SO2 tolerance for NH3-SCR is crucial to control NOx emission at low temperature. In this work, Mn-Ce/AC and Mn-Ce-V/AC catalysts were prepared through wet impregnations. The enhanced effects of V2O5 on the catalytic performance and SO2 tolerance over Mn-Ce/AC catalysts were evaluated in the temperature range of 100-300 degrees C. The denitration performance results indicated that doping V2O5 enhanced the NO conversion and N-2 selectivity. Importantly, co-doping V2O5 made Mn-Ce(0.4)-V/AC exhibit improved SO2 tolerance than Mn-Ce/AC. The physical and chemical properties of fresh and SO2 poisoned catalysts were characterized by N-2 physisorption, XRD, SEM-EDS, H-2-TPR, NH3-TPD, SO2-TPD, XPS, and TG. The characterization results showed that doping V(2)O(5 )strengthened the surface acidity and enriched the surface chemisorbed oxygen resulting in accelerating the SCR reaction. The promoted SCR reaction and stronger surface acidity over Mn-Ce(0.4)-V/AC restrained the competitive adsorption of SO2 and limited the reaction between adsorbed SO2 and NH3 species. Moreover, the clusters of vanadium oxide species partly prevented the dispersive Mn-Ce solid solution from being sulfated by SO2. Finally, the probable mechanism for improved SO2 tolerance over V2O5-modified Mn-Ce(0.4)/AC catalyst was proposed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available