4.7 Article

Rational synthesis of ternary FeS@TiO2@C nanotubes as anode for superior Na-ion batteries

Journal

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
Volume 359, Issue -, Pages 765-774

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2018.11.191

Keywords

Na-ion batteries; Metal-organic framework; Ternary composites; Nanotubes; Carbon-encapsulation

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51771076]
  2. Project of Public Interest Research and Capacity Building of Guangdong Province [2017A010104004]
  3. Guangzhou Science and Technology Plan Projects [201707010243, 201804010104]
  4. Chinese Government
  5. Guangdong Province Universities and Colleges Young Pearl River Scholar Funded Scheme

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Na-ion batteries (SIBs) have now attractive extensive attention due to the wide-spread preserve of sodium resources and low cost, which have the potential as the alternative for Li-ion batteries and suitable for large energy station application. Herein, we have rationally synthesized uniform nanotube-structured FeS@TiO2@ C anode with metal-organic framework (Fe-MOF) rods as the self-support template. Such uniform ternary FeS@TiO2@C nanotubes were facilely prepared by sulfuration of FeTiO3@C nanotubes, which were obtained by a one-pot annealing of TiO2-coated Fe-MOF nanorods. This carbon-wrapped hollow nanostructure could effectively mitigate the volume expansion, improve the electronic conductivity and provide more channels and active sites for Na+ transporting. In detail, these uniform FeS@TiO2@C nanotubes achieve superior rate capability (with a high reversible capacity of 387, 390, 376, 348, 325, and 286 mA h g(-1) at the current density of 0.1, 0.2, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, and 5.0 A g(-1), respectively) and excellent cycling performance (with a reversible capacity of 454 mA h g(-1) after 120 cycles at 0.2 A g(-1) and 406 mA h g(-1) after 150 cycles at 1.0 A g(-1)).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available