4.6 Article

Fairy Tales versus Facts: Genre Matters to the Developing Brain

Journal

CEREBRAL CORTEX
Volume 29, Issue 11, Pages 4877-4888

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhz025

Keywords

comprehension; language; neuroimaging

Categories

Funding

  1. NIH/NICHD [P20 HD075443, R01 HD044073, R01 HD067254, U54 HD083211]
  2. NCATS/NIH [UL1 TR000445]
  3. [1S10OD021771-01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Neurobiological studies of discourse comprehension have almost exclusively focused on narrative comprehension. However, successful engagement in modern society, particularly in educational settings, also requires comprehension with an aim to learn new information (i.e., expository comprehension). Despite its prevalence, no studies to date have neurobiologically characterized expository comprehension as compared with narrative. In the current study, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging in typically developing children to test whether different genres require specialized brain networks. In addition to expected activations in language and comprehension areas in the default mode network (DMN), expository comprehension required significantly greater activation in the frontoparietal control network (FPN) than narrative comprehension, and relied significantly less on posterior regions in the DMN. Functional connectivity analysis revealed that, compared with narrative, the FPN robustly correlated with the DMN, and this inter-network communication was higher with increased reading expertise. These findings suggest that, relative to narrative comprehension, expository comprehension shows (1) a unique configuration of the DMN, potentially to support non-social comprehension processes, and (2) increased utilization of top-down regions to help support goal-directed comprehension processes in the DMN. More generally, our findings reveal that different types of discourse-level comprehension place diverse neural demands on the developing brain.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available