4.8 Article

A Platform for Generation of Chamber-Specific Cardiac Tissues and Disease Modeling

Journal

CELL
Volume 176, Issue 4, Pages 913-+

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.11.042

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) [MOP-126027, MOP-137107, MOP-142382]
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) Discovery Grant [RGPIN 326982-10]
  3. NSERC-CIHR Collaborative Health Research Grant [CHRP 493737-16]
  4. National Institutes of Health [2R01 HL076485, UG3 EB025765, P41 EB002520, U01 HL107437, R01 HL125580]
  5. NSERC Steacie Fellowship
  6. Canada Research Chair
  7. NSERC Post-graduate Fellowship
  8. TOeP NSERC CREATE
  9. Ted Rogers Center for Heart Research Doctoral Award

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Tissue engineering using cardiomyocytes derived from human pluripotent stem cells holds a promise to revolutionize drug discovery, but only if limitations related to cardiac chamber specification and platform versatility can be overcome. We describe here a scalable tissue-cultivation platform that is cell source agnostic and enables drug testing under electrical pacing. The plastic platform enabled on-line noninvasive recording of passive tension, active force, contractile dynamics, and Ca2+ transients, as well as endpoint assessments of action potentials and conduction velocity. By combining directed cell differentiation with electrical field conditioning, we engineered electrophysio-logically distinct atrial and ventricular tissues with chamber-specific drug responses and gene expression. We report, for the first time, engineering of heteropolar cardiac tissues containing distinct atrial and ventricular ends, and we demonstrate their spatially confined responses to serotonin and ranolazine. Uniquely, electrical conditioning for up to 8 months enabled modeling of polygenic left ventricular hypertrophy starting from patient cells.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available