4.8 Article

Distinct Immune Cell Populations Define Response to Anti-PD-1 Monotherapy and Anti-PD-1/Anti-CTLA-4 Combined Therapy

Journal

CANCER CELL
Volume 35, Issue 2, Pages 238-+

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.ccell.2019.01.003

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Melanoma Institute Australia
  2. New South Wales Department of Health
  3. NSW Health Pathology
  4. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (NHMRC) [APP1093017]
  5. Cancer Institute NSW
  6. NHMRC Fellowships
  7. University of Sydney Medical Foundation
  8. University of Sydney
  9. Cancer Institute NSW Fellowship
  10. Melanoma Foundation of the University of Sydney
  11. Cancer Council NSW [RG18-08, RG17-04]
  12. Australian Cancer Research Foundation (Tumor Metabolism Laboratory)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cancer immunotherapies provide survival benefits in responding patients, but many patients fail to respond. Identifying the biology of treatment response and resistance are a priority to optimize drug selection and improve patient outcomes. We performed transcriptomic and immune profiling on 158 tumor biopsies from melanoma patients treated with anti-PD-1 monotherapy (n = 63) or combined anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 (n = 57). These data identified activated T cell signatures and T cell populations in responders to both treatments. Further mass cytometry analysis identified an EOMES(+)CD69(+)CD45RO(+) effector memory T cell phenotype that was significantly more abundant in responders to combined immunotherapy compared with non-responders (n = 18). The gene expression profile of this population was associated with longer progression-free survival in patients treated with single agent and greater tumor shrinkage in both treatments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available