4.4 Article

Surface Deformations and Rupture Processes Associated with the 2017 Mw 5.4 Pohang, Korea, Earthquake

Journal

BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA
Volume 109, Issue 2, Pages 756-769

Publisher

SEISMOLOGICAL SOC AMER
DOI: 10.1785/0120180167

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [2018M3D7A-1052897]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In November 2017, an M-w 5.4 earthquake with a shallow (similar to 4 km) hypocenter occurred in the Pohang area, one of the most developing industrial cities in South Korea. This shock resulted in the costliest earthquake damages in modern Korean history. Immediately after the event, it was not easy to recognize the source fault due to the lack of clear coseismic surface ruptures but also the absence of previously mapped active faults around the epicenter. Based on satellite- and unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)-derived images, with ground resolution higher than 0.5 m, and field observations, we investigate surface deformation such as sand blows and ground failures associated with the Pohang earthquake as well as bedrock fault exposures in the epicentral area. To better constrain the source fault and deformation mechanism, we combine both moment tensors with aftershock relocations and surface displacements estimated by Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR). Our results indicate that (1) various types and distributions of secondary ground deformation were controlled by blind oblique-slip rupture; characterized by right-lateral and reverse-slip components, on a reactivated pre-existing segmented normal-fault system, and (2) local ground conditions could trigger or amplify ground deformations and their related earthquake damage. Our study highlights the importance of mapping the extent of coseismic deformation as well as the trace of active faults on improving seismic hazard assessments in the Korean Peninsula.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available