4.6 Review

From bench to bedside: the past, present and future of therapy for systemic paediatric ALCL, ALK

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY
Volume 185, Issue 6, Pages 1043-1054

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/bjh.15763

Keywords

anaplastic large cell lymphoma; anaplastic lymphoma kinase; anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitors; Children's Oncology Group; European Inter-Group for Childhood non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

Categories

Funding

  1. EU Horizon 2020 Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions Innovative Training Network (ITNETN) 'ALKATRAS' [675712]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) is a T cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma that mainly presents in paediatric and young adult patients. The majority of cases express a chimeric fusion protein resulting in hyperactivation of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) as the consequence of a chromosomal translocation. Rarer cases lack expression of ALK fusion proteins and are categorised as ALCL, ALK-. An adapted regimen of an historic chemotherapy backbone is still used to this day, yielding overall survival (OS) of over 90% but with event-free survival (EFS) at an unacceptable 70%, improving little over the past 30 years. It is clear that continued adaption of current therapies will probably not improve these statistics and, for progress to be made, integration of biology with the design and implementation of future clinical trials is required. Indeed, advances in our understanding of the biology of ALCL are outstripping our ability to clinically translate them; laboratory-based research has highlighted a plethora of potential therapeutic targets but, with high survival rates combined with a scarcity of funding and patients to implement paediatric trials of novel agents, progress is slow. However, advances must be made to reduce the side-effects of intensive chemotherapy regimens whilst maintaining, if not improving, OS and EFS.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available